Unlock the Editor’s Digest without cost
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly publication.
A gaggle of buyers has known as on Samsung’s de facto holding firm to extend dividends and institute share buybacks, as strain mounts on South Korean firms to handle their low valuations.
US hedge fund Whitebox Advisors, UK fund Metropolis of London Funding Administration and Seoul-based fund Anda Asset Administration submitted their proposals on Friday forward of Samsung C&T’s annual assembly in March. The funds maintain a stake of simply over 1 per cent within the firm.
The corporate, whose operations span building and retail and thru which the conglomerate’s ruling Lee household controls tech large Samsung Electronics, trades at greater than 65 per cent beneath its internet asset worth, making it a goal for buyers campaigning to slim the long-standing “Korea low cost”.
“Moderately than tackle native and overseas shareholder issues about this long-term underperformance, Samsung C&T’s board has repeatedly dismissed or ignored our strategies for enhancing shareholder worth,” the funds wrote to shareholders on Friday. “Our group has excessive conviction that this view is shared by a good portion of the shareholder base.”
The try to shake up South Korea’s strongest and storied conglomerate comes because the nation’s leaders search to copy Tokyo’s drive to lift valuations. Japan’s Nikkei touched 34-year highs in January, pushed by outflows of capital from China and a concerted effort from Japanese authorities to enhance company governance.
President Yoon Suk Yeol has mentioned boosting native inventory valuations is considered one of his administration’s high priorities. Yoon mentioned final month that he supported the introduction of a authorized fiduciary obligation to shareholders, whereas South Korea’s high monetary regulator has floated the potential for replicating Tokyo’s “identify and disgrace” regime for firms failing to current proposals to enhance valuations.
The worth-to-book ratio of firms listed on South Korea’s flagship Kospi index is 0.91, considerably decrease than the Nikkei 225’s 2.01. Buyers accuse the founding households of South Korea’s largest conglomerates of prioritising management of their sprawling enterprise empires over paying dividends and boosting profitability.
“The Korean inventory market remains to be actually low cost due to dangerous company governance and ineffective capital allocation,” mentioned Darren Kang, chief funding officer at Seoul-based fund Life Asset Administration.
However Changhwan Lee, an activist investor and founding father of Seoul-based hedge fund Align Companions, mentioned the “panorama has modified dramatically” for the reason that variety of South Korean retail buyers greater than tripled in the course of the coronavirus pandemic.
That led to the introduction of reforms to guard the pursuits of minority shareholders, which in flip helped spur the expansion of a new breed of native activist funds.
“Each time share costs rise in Japan whereas remaining flat in Korea, it strengthens the arguments of native advocates for reform,” mentioned Lee.
South Korea had the third-highest variety of activist campaigns on the earth final 12 months, behind solely the US and Japan, in line with Insightia. There have been 60 activist campaigns in South Korea within the first half of 2023, in contrast with 18 within the first half of 2021.
Robin Baik, a Seoul-based accomplice at worldwide litigation agency Kobre & Kim, famous that with parliamentary elections due in April, the authorities had been below strain to introduce new insurance policies.
A senior funding banker in Seoul mentioned bigger overseas buyers nonetheless wanted to see extra concrete indicators of progress earlier than redirecting capital away from bigger markets equivalent to Japan and India.
However James Smith, who oversaw a collection of bruising campaigns at Samsung and Hyundai when he was head of Elliott Administration’s Hong Kong workplace, mentioned the case for investing in undervalued South Korean firms equivalent to Samsung C&T remained “stunningly compelling”.
“We really feel strongly that the Japanese precedent is driving incremental change in Korea,” mentioned Smith, whose London-based fund Palliser Capital has known as on Samsung C&T’s administration to reform its capital allocation practices.
Kang mentioned even modest progress by activists at Samsung C&T’s annual assembly would have a “cascading impact”.
“If they’re profitable, that can ship a robust sign each to Korean firms and to overseas buyers that it’s potential for them to co-operate.”
Extra reporting by Andy Lin in Hong Kong