From January to December 2022, the Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL), which holds a 60/40 combine, misplaced 15.04%, almost as a lot because the 16.88% decline posted by the 100%-stocks Vanguard All-Fairness ETF Portfolio (VEQT). The issue wasn’t the shares; traders ought to count on volatility with them. It was the bonds.
As rates of interest spiked to fight inflation, the bond element of VBAL was hit exhausting. Its higher-than-average intermediate length (a measure of fee sensitivity) meant that costs fell extra sharply than shorter-term bond holdings may need. This caught many conservative traders off guard, notably those that believed fastened revenue would supply ballast in a downturn.
In response, many portfolio strategists started proposing a brand new mannequin: the 40/30/30. That’s 40% equities, 30% bonds, and 30% options.
Whereas establishments and advisors have entry to classy personal options to make this work, the query is whether or not Canadian retail traders can replicate an analogous construction utilizing publicly listed ETFs. Right here’s my take, and a few urged ETFs to acquire publicity to the choice area.
What’s the 40/30/30 portfolio?
The 40/30/30 portfolio is a conceptual framework that modifies the standard balanced portfolio by carving out area for different property. The thought is to introduce a 3rd asset class that behaves in a different way from the opposite two.
In durations like 2022, when each shares and bonds declined collectively as a consequence of rising inflation and rates of interest, conventional diversification methods failed. The additional options sleeve is designed to protect capital in instances when the opposite two pillars of a portfolio transfer in tandem.
It’s not a one-size-fits-all prescription. The 30% allotted to options can range broadly relying on the portfolio supervisor’s preferences. In most institutional and advisor-led implementations, that portion may embody:
- Hedge fund-like methods equivalent to long-short fairness, managed futures, lengthy volatility, and market-neutral approaches that depend on quantitative fashions and multi-asset publicity to generate absolute returns.
- Exhausting property or digital shops of worth like gold, commodities, or cryptocurrencies equivalent to bitcoin, usually used as static allocations to offset conventional monetary asset volatility.
- Personal market investments equivalent to personal fairness, personal credit score, and direct actual property holdings, which provide long-term return potential in alternate for liquidity danger and restricted pricing transparency.
MoneySense’s ETF Screener Device
Does the 40/30/30 portfolio work?
It’s exhausting to attract agency conclusions as a result of two components restrict the usefulness of most information used to help the 40/30/30 thesis.
The primary is survivorship bias. It’s simple to look backward and determine methods that delivered low correlation and stable returns, however that’s hindsight. Traders didn’t essentially have entry to those funds or conviction in them when it mattered most. The hazard is cherry-picking success tales that weren’t broadly identified or accessible on the time.
Second, outcomes are extremely time-period dependent. The efficiency of any diversified technique can range meaningfully relying on the beginning and finish dates. A couple of good or dangerous years in options can drastically skew the general return and danger profile of a portfolio.
That mentioned, there’s a comparatively sturdy benchmark with over twenty years of knowledge that helps assess the viability of the idea: the MLM Index. This benchmark tracks a scientific trend-following technique throughout 11 commodities, six currencies, and 5 international bond futures markets. It weights every class based mostly on historic volatility and equal-weights particular person contracts inside every basket. Whereas not an ideal proxy for all options, it affords uncommon long-term, clear, and rule-based information in an area usually missing each.
Utilizing information from Nov. 12, 2001, via Aug. 19, 2025, a 40/30/30 portfolio constructed with the S&P 500, Bloomberg U.S. Mixture Bond Index, and KFA MLM Index (rebalanced quarterly) underperformed a standard 60/40 combine on complete returns, with a 6.89% compound annual progress fee (CAGR) versus 7.46%. Nevertheless, it considerably outperformed on a risk-adjusted foundation, with a Sharpe ratio of 0.71 versus 0.56.
Extra importantly, the diversification profit confirmed up when it mattered. The 40/30/30 portfolio demonstrated higher draw back safety throughout key stress occasions just like the bursting of the dot-com bubble, the 2008 monetary disaster, the COVID-19 crash in 2020 and the bear market of 2022.
Traders can entry the KFA MLM Index via a U.S.-listed ETF: the KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Technique ETF (KMLM). It instantly tracks the benchmark and gives publicity to trend-following futures methods throughout commodities, currencies and stuck revenue.
The catch? Since KMLM is U.S.-listed, Canadians face a number of hurdles: foreign money conversion, a excessive 0.90% administration expense ratio, and a 15% overseas withholding tax on distributions except it’s held in a registered retirement financial savings plan (RRSP).
