Tuesday, August 26, 2025
HomeFinancial PlanningTranscript: Sarah Kirshbaum Levy, CEO Betterment

Transcript: Sarah Kirshbaum Levy, CEO Betterment


 

The transcript from this week’s, MiB: Sarah Kirshbaum Levy, CEO Betterment, is beneath.

You’ll be able to stream and obtain our full dialog, together with any podcast extras, on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, and Bloomberg. All of our earlier podcasts in your favourite pod hosts might be discovered right here.

~~~

That is Masters in enterprise with Barry Ritholtz on Bloomberg Radio.

00:00:07 [BARRY RITHOLTZ] This week on the podcast, I’ve an additional particular visitor, Sarah Kirschbaum Levy, CEO of Betterment has an enchanting background in media, model constructing, advertising, in addition to finance. She began out as an intern at, at Goldman Sachs. She had stints at at Disney earlier than happening to be Chief Working Officer at Nickelodeon, after which ultimately the Viacom Media Community. I, if you wish to see somebody who’s been immersed in branding and media and advertising for an entire profession, it’s more durable to seek out anyone with Sarah’s breadth of expertise. The pivot into digital asset administration and Betterment was a bit of little bit of a shock, however quite a lot of the abilities are very transferrable and he or she’s actually finished a, a, a considerable job at Betterment. They’re now over $40 billion. I believe they’re the biggest impartial digital advisor that’s on the market. Yeah, Schwab and, and Vanguard and Constancy have their very own, however clearly they’re coming off of trillions of {dollars}. This can be a firm that’s barely a decade outdated and is ramped as much as over $40 billion fairly rapidly. If you happen to’re taken with advertising, branding, asset administration, how do use digital instruments to not solely make the method cheaper and the, within the person expertise higher, however simply to provide prospects what they need? I believe you’ll discover this dialog to be fairly fascinating. Full disclosure, my agency, OLTs Wealth Administration, works with Betterment, which powers our digital funding platform. With no additional ado, my dialogue with Betterment, CEO, Sarah Kirschbaum Levy.

00:02:00 [Sarah Kirschbaum Levy] Thanks a lot, Barry, for having me.

00:02:02 [BARRY RITHOLTZ] Thanks for coming. I’ve been wanting ahead to this since we began chatting. What was that? At Futureproof in September, proper? That’s proper. So it’s been a few months, so, so let’s discuss a bit of bit about your early profession, which is sort of fascinating. You’re employed as an analyst at Disney, and then you definitely’re a summer time intern at Goldman Sachs. What was the profession plan?

00:02:24 [Speaker Changed] So, I don’t know if it was a lot a plan. I used to be simply at a school and I liked the media enterprise, you understand, interested by how did, why did I land at Disney as my first job? I all the time appeared to my mother and father and their careers by way of what they liked. And I had a perception early on that for those who liked what you had been doing, you had been gonna give your all and also you had been gonna excel and, and also you had been gonna wanna make it, you understand, a an even bigger and greater a part of your life. So my father was a ebook writer and my mom was an antiques vendor. And for those who requested them on the weekends, you understand, what do you wanna do? My father would roam bookstores and my mom would go antiquing it at, you understand, flea markets and issues. So I assumed, what do I like?

00:03:05 And I liked the films, so I assumed, is there a technique to be within the film enterprise? Effectively, as a enterprise govt, when you study a bit of bit concerning the motion pictures, you notice the film enterprise shouldn’t be a lot an ideal enterprise. However Disney as a model actually excited me. And so I assumed I might study kind of past motion pictures and I might study mental property and I might study manufacturers and all that. So, so I began at Disney and I used to be within the company group the place we did quite a lot of m and a and strategic work on behalf of the movie and tv division. And my summer time pivot was actually, I used to be doing offers and I used to be doing media. And so the query for me was, is it media I like? Or is it offers I like? And I examined that thesis by spending the summer time at Goldman, and I labored, I had an ideal expertise there. Once more, nice model, nice firm discovered, discovered as a lot as you possibly can study in a summer time, summer time job, however actually liked the media venture I used to be engaged on greater than the opposite initiatives. And in order that sort of led me again to media for full-time

00:04:08 [Speaker Changed] From Goldman Sachs as a summer time affiliate to Nickelodeon. I suppose you made the choice that it was media over banking.

00:04:17 [Speaker Changed] I did. That’s precisely proper.

00:04:18 [Speaker Changed] And and the way did it go if you started as a, a, an early worker at Nickelodeon?

00:04:24 [Speaker Changed] Effectively, the factor that I used to be drawn to at Nickelodeon actually hearkened again to my Disney begin, which was, it was an ideal model and so they had an ideal mission, which, which was what’s good for youths is nice for enterprise and or I dunno if that’s a mission a lot as a, a great,

00:04:40 [Speaker Changed] Good slogan. Anyway, good tagline,

00:04:42 [Speaker Changed] Good tagline. However, however I believe it’s, it was actually what sort of powered our interested by our merchandise and our companies was how, you understand, how can we enrich the content material we had been making for youths? And for those who advised individuals you labored for Nickelodeon, kind of like, for those who advised them you labored for Disney, they’d smile. And I, you understand, I actually liked that and I assumed working for a model that everyone loves is a extremely highly effective concept. And so I began in technique and, and I didn’t know the place it will take me, truthfully. And grew up on the enterprise, it was, it was the time. I imply, arduous to have a look at it now, however on the time, cable was in its progress innings and, you understand, we had been rising 30 plus p.c a 12 months, and it was enjoyable.

00:05:21 [Speaker Changed] I can think about that was quite a lot of enjoyable. So from technique, inform us about the remainder of the profession path you took at Nickelodeon and ultimately we’ll get to Viacom.

00:05:30 [Speaker Changed] Sure. So Nickelodeon actually is a division of Viacom, proper? And so on the time every of the manufacturers had been run as their very own distinct enterprise items.

00:05:40 [Speaker Changed] Siloed was that? As a result of as I used to be wanting by means of your resume and also you begin taking a look at Viacom, it’s MTV, it’s Nickelodeon, it’s Comedy Central, it’s bt there’s like a dozen or extra manufacturers, I wasn’t positive. Are these all run independently or are they run as a part of a giant conglomerate or a bit of bit of every?

00:05:59 [Speaker Changed] So over my two plus a long time on the firm, the reply is sure and sure, proper? So there was quite a lot of organizational change, however within the early days once we had been rising actually quick, the organizational design precept was actually round audiences, proper? And what viewers you served. And so every of the model teams, so to talk, had been designed round actually un understanding your buyer section and tremendous serving them. So my group was the children group. We then grew up into the children and household group and added different manufacturers into our portfolio. However there have been quite a lot of organizational design adjustments over time. After which quick ahead to my second decade, once I began to maneuver as much as Viacom and broaden past Nickelodeon, in these days, we moved to extra of a platform the place every of the manufacturers actually had separate management, however that management was actually targeted on content material and advertising. However the entire industrial execution was, was put collectively.

00:06:54 [Speaker Changed] In order you’re shifting up the ladder at Nickelodeon, you find yourself as COO at Nickelodeon. That’s proper. Is that proper? That’s proper. How lengthy did you try this for and and what was that like?

00:07:02 [Speaker Changed] I did that for over a decade, I believe.

00:07:04 [Speaker Changed] Oh, actually? That lengthy? Sure. Sure. And, and is that, was that the springboard to COO at father or mother firm Viacom?

00:07:10 [Speaker Changed] That was the springboard. So what occurred was to your organizational design adjustments level is principally we began to merge totally different items of the enterprise and realized that we would have liked to be a extra environment friendly platform, proper? Clearly the stress of streaming  began and we began to see, you understand, much more stress on the advert enterprise. So that you had a high line that was challenged and also you needed to rethink the organizational design. And so we began to place the items collectively and I emerged and moved as much as company to supervise basically the combining of the varied manufacturers.

00:07:41 [Speaker Changed] Does does something at Viacom right this moment, what, what’s their streaming enterprise like?

00:07:46 [Speaker Changed] Effectively, now it’s, they’ve renamed the, the corporate, and so now it’s known as Paramount World. Proper? And they also have Paramount Plus, which is a

00:07:53 [Speaker Changed] We’re a consumer, we’re A subscriber

00:07:54 [Speaker Changed]  Okay, there you go. They usually even have Pluto television, which we purchased whereas I used to be there, which is an advert supported, I believe they now name them quick channels, however advert supported streaming channels, free

00:08:05 [Speaker Changed] Advert supported tv. There you

00:08:06 [Speaker Changed] Huh? That, that, that’s actually attention-grabbing. So, so you might be there actually in an incredible transition. You’re there as we, because the web explodes, like once I was rising up with the web within the nineties, it was sort of pokey and dial up. It wasn’t till a bit of later that there was any actual bandwidth put up put up.com implosion. You’re there as streaming ramps up as video video games change into substantial. How do you consider the way you guys did dealing with these adjustments? After which I wish to ask, how do you suppose the remainder of the media trade has finished?

00:08:44 [Speaker Changed] Look, I believe one of many causes I made the profession pivot I did is as a result of it’s actually arduous to be the analog incumbent who’s must, you understand, battle a battle in a digital warfare when the, the brand new, the newbies, so to talk, have low cost capital, proper? And have the power to candidly, to take a position and lose cash in ways in which the incumbents can’t. Proper? So I believe, you understand, definitionally, we had been danger averse, so you know the way no.

00:09:12 [Speaker Changed] Additionally large legacy infrastructure…

00:09:15 [Speaker Changed] With nice economics desires that, proper? A large legacy infrastructure that had twin income streams and that had unimaginable margins. And, you understand, it’s all the time arduous to check a greenback invested within the core enterprise that’s gonna return, you understand, 60 cents versus a greenback invested within the new enterprise, which you understand, is your future, however that’s gonna lose cash outta the gate, proper?

00:09:34 [Speaker Changed] Cl basic innovator’s dilemma. There

00:09:36 [Speaker Changed] You go. So, so I believe, you understand, once more, that is kind of the catalyst for my profession pivot later, however, however I believe the truth is how did we do, you understand, the streaming companies ate our lunch, however they’d a structural benefit and we weren’t courageous.

00:09:51 [Speaker Changed] Huh. That’s actually attention-grabbing. By the way in which, it’s straightforward to eat individuals’s lunch if you’re keen to lose billions of {dollars} a 12 months to ascertain a model and, and seize market share

00:10:01 [Speaker Changed] And when capital is essentially free or low cost, proper? So I believe the mix of these issues simply put us at an obstacle. And it’s attention-grabbing to observe now truly, as a result of one of many insights, proper, the insights that the streamers had had been all concerning the buyer expertise. They had been about, you understand, adverts being, you understand, interruptive to the content material, proper? And shoppers didn’t like that, proper? So that they went at it and mentioned, we’re gonna, we’re gonna design one thing that’s pleasant for the patron. I believe what, what they’re now studying is that the financial mannequin that they began with was not a sustainable financial mannequin, that means they’re now introducing adverts, the twin income
stream they’re seeing, and the worth level at which they had been providing, name it limitless content material, actually simply extra content material was once more, not sustainable,

00:10:44 [Speaker Changed] Proper? They usually’ve all raised their costs dramatically. Though I might push again on the phrase pleasant, as a result of for those who’ve ever gone, and that is true for everyone from Netflix to Amazon, to HBO, for those who’ve ever tried to floor content material, Hey, I like these motion pictures. Present me that, present me what else I’d like, they’re not particularly good at that. I, I don’t suppose anybody’s been good at that since again within the days of the Netflix DVD by mail. However all people is, my spouse is like, are you actually gonna simply spend a half hour scrolling by means of nonsense? It’s, they don’t appear to have figured that out but. And I’m shocked.

00:11:24 [Speaker Changed] I I agree with that. I imply, I believe the kind of, you understand, the algorithmic advice was kind of the holy grail, and I believe it hasn’t, it hasn’t labored as nicely. It’s not that good. It’s not that good. However once more, for those who suppose, once more, suppose again to the cable days, what our manufacturers did is our model’s organized content material round audiences and pursuits, proper? And so that you kind of had a bonus, proper? Web what Netflix is making an attempt to do is serve all people. And so you could have this sea of content material and the way do you sift by means of it? So it it’s a a tough problem.

00:11:53 [Speaker Changed] Yeah. That, that advice engine that individuals who favored A, B, C must also like 1, 2, 3. I, I’m shocked that it hasn’t gotten higher. However la final topic earlier than we pivot. So that you’re at Viacom and also you’re driving quite a lot of change. You’re spearheading new, new segments. You’re, you’re pushing into retail, digital, gaming, shopper merchandise, even Broadway reveals, issues like that, theme parks, video on demand. I’m gonna assume you don’t suppose that you just thought that was needed, however not adequate to battle off the large streamers.

00:12:32 [Speaker Changed] Effectively, I believe that wasn’t about combating off the streamers a lot as about increasing the enterprise. If you happen to, if you consider actually the children’ mental property extra, so once I joined Nickelodeon, it was actually about becoming a member of a children’ model as a result of I understood the ability from my expertise at Disney of youngsters love and keenness for characters and tales and the way you possibly can deepen their engagement along with your model by means of merchandise and experiences. And so one of many causes I went to Nickelodeon was actually on that thesis, which was they had been a cable channel and actually a platform greater than something, proper? They had been, they had been a platform. We had been at the moment kind of pre YouTube. We,
we had 60 or 70% of all children leisure time was spent on Nickelodeon. It was an amazingly highly effective platform. And so the query was, you could have their consideration, you’re constructing these characters and tales they love, how do you’re taking that love and immerse them extra deeply in your model?

00:13:27 And people characters from SpongeBob to Dora the Explorer to the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, proper? These had been the, the good manufacturers of my tenure there. And so, in order that’s what we did. We mentioned, okay, you understand, take a look at Disney, proper? They’ve theme parks, they’ve lodges, they’ve toys and t-shirts, et cetera, et cetera. And all of that was alternative. I believe that was much less so a chance within the, within the grownup focused manufacturers, proper? Adults don’t, you understand, after they fall in love with a personality or a narrative like there’s solely a lot Jersey Shore you wanna put on in your t-shirt. Proper?

00:13:57 [Speaker Changed] To, to say the very least, so we mentioned Nickelodeon’s entrance into gamings and merchandise and different issues. How did you come away from that have? Was it nearly maximizing income or was it actually about constructing out the model?

00:14:16 [Speaker Changed] I believe for me it was about constructing out the model and it was additionally about scaling and optimizing an operation.

00:14:25 [Speaker Changed] So I simply image a giant boardroom if you’re getting into to make the pitch, Hey, we’ve to transcend simply doing reveals for youths. There’s an entire universe of how we will monetize our mental property. What, what was that pitch like? Am I, am I remotely near, you understand, that, that stereotypical picture and and the way tough was it to get a giant large and already profitable firm to embrace an entire new set of income streams?

00:14:57 [Speaker Changed] So I simply shivered if you put the picture of the large boardroom again in, in my thoughts, proper, that I believe you’re nicely,

00:15:02 [Speaker Changed] Is that correct?

00:15:03 [Speaker Changed] That only a Effectively, no, that, that’s correct for positive. I believe, you understand, the pitch, the way in which wherein we entered the enterprise, and once more, again to my remark earlier that, you understand, I don’t suppose we had been courageous. We had been, we licensed the content material so it didn’t require an unlimited funding, proper? So we might work with toy corporations, we labored with a lodge enterprise, we labored with cruise ships and principally lent them our characters in alternate for income. So there was a, a extremely quite a lot of scrutiny round sort of the model affect and the model danger potential. Interested by the draw back of doing a few of that, proper? Proper. What if a child will get harm with a toy? You understand, that sort of factor. Okay. Proper. So I believe we put, we, we considered that fairly a bit and there have been services we had been unwilling, like individuals would pitch us issues like a child’s bank card, proper? And inspiring children to enter debt was not precisely a part of the model plan, proper? It’s, it,

00:15:54 [Speaker Changed] It’s, it’s nice ’trigger they’re not 18, so they might stroll away from the, the debt, proper? Or did did their mother and father should go?

00:16:01 [Speaker Changed] Suppose the what’s good for youths is nice for enterprise, actually prevailed on that one. So in any occasion, we, we thought of all types of issues and other people would pitch us.

00:16:10 [Speaker Changed] SpongeBob’ Bow and Arrow didn’t, didn’t take off?

00:16:12 [Speaker Changed] It didn’t, it didn’t make the minimize. No, by no means. However I’ll say that we did have a couple of instances once we had some kind of braver concepts round, you understand, investing extra deeply in a few of these segments. And people did require pitches, you understand, precisely as you precisely as you say. And we finally didn’t determine to go ahead with greater investments, proper? Shopping for part of a theme park, you understand, franchise for instance. So we, we by no means, we by no means made that transfer. Different corporations made different selections there, proper? NBC Common, proper, proper. Disney, et cetera.

00:16:43 [Speaker Changed] It, it, it’s attention-grabbing to see that the extra profitable an organization is, the extra danger averse they are typically. They don’t wish to, you understand, don’t kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.

00:16:55 [Speaker Changed] It’s, I imply, it’s inevitable, proper? You’re additionally, you’re a public firm, you’re dwelling quarter to quarter and the concerns are totally different

00:17:02 [Speaker Changed] To say, to say the, the very least. So, so let’s discuss a bit of bit about media as so totally different than finance, however actually does all of it come down to those are shopper manufacturers and for those who can construct a model and present its worth proposition and current it in a, in a sensible technique to an viewers, it doesn’t matter whether or not it’s digital investing or children programming. Branding is branding.

00:17:30 [Speaker Changed] I imply, I believe from a branding and advertising standpoint, sure, I do suppose it interprets extremely nicely. And I believe finally your model wants to satisfy a necessity or resolve a ache level for a shopper, proper? And so all of it begins with the patron and the patron analysis. And that was one thing that we had been extremely good at at Viacom with all of those actually, actually focused area of interest manufacturers. We, we actually invested lots in our analysis and in understanding that shopper. So I believe that interprets extremely nicely. Te

00:17:56 [Speaker Changed] Inform us a bit of bit about what that course of is like. ’trigger you all the time image a bunch of individuals in a room with a two-way mirror and ask, exhibiting them clips or exhibiting them toys. What was the, the patron analysis like at Viacom?

00:18:11 [Speaker Changed] So, I imply, there’s so many ranges, you understand, each, each quantitative and qualitative. So there have been quite a lot of focus teams, there was quite a lot of on the spot suggestions within the type of scores and evaluation, kind of, you understand, put up facto, proper after you air the programming, there was pilot testing. I imply, we might sit with children and present them footage of characters and you understand, they’d remark at each step of the way in which. We had been principally bringing issues to children and watching them react. Do they giggle? You understand, do they hug the the toy? You understand, are they, are they drawn into the character? So, so we examined storylines, we examined characters, after which that was kind of early days in content material. We did much less. I believe now when you consider digital testing and you consider kind of ab testing messages, proper? The flexibility to do this actually was remodeled sort of over time as we began to construct a digital footprint.

00:19:02 However once more, all of this was in service of asking the proper questions of your shopper and attending to them in sort of alternative ways, after which triangulating the place to subsequent. After which we needed to take these manufacturers after all and transfer them off of tv, not simply into toys, however constructing a digital footprint was kind of the subsequent, you understand, the subsequent act, proper? And also you notice, and there was a rigidity in that too, proper? As a result of there was kind of, are you gifting away your content material at no cost? Or are you immersing your viewers within the content material? And understanding every of those platforms was totally different. And so I believe all of that actually interprets as you construct a model, you, it’s a must to take into consideration what platforms are you on and what’s the aim of being in these, you understand, on these platforms.

00:19:43 [Speaker Changed] So Actually, actually, actually attention-grabbing. How, how totally different is youngsters’s programming if you’re doing that kind of analysis to adults? ’trigger there are such a lot of notorious tales about reveals testing poorly and hanging on, and that Seinfeld involves thoughts examined actually poorly, goes on to change into probably the most widespread reveals of all time. And issues like Raiders of the Misplaced Ark couldn’t get, couldn’t ma Get Made or Star Wars had hassle discovering a studio that no one favored the assessments of it. Is it totally different with children or they extra unguarded and rapid? After which how do you determine how you can apply that when you find yourself at taking a look at BET or Comedy Central and even MTV, which is kind of in between age-wise?

00:20:29 [Speaker Changed] We considered every part as an enter, proper? And so I believe it’s a must to take every part with a grain of salt within the sense that allow’s say you’re doing, you understand, three or 4 focus teams, you’ve acquired 10 or so individuals in every of these focus teams, you’re making an attempt to tug  themes and insights. Generally one loud individual within the focus group can affect all people else. So that you’re expecting that. I believe in children, what you’re actually on the lookout for is you’re simply on the lookout for sparks and also you, and typically their bodily response is, as a lot as they’re, typically they don’t have the vocabulary, we, we had preschool tv, proper? Proper. Generally they don’t have the vocabulary to articulate in the way in which that adults do. You understand, I didn’t like that character, he was imply or no matter. Proper? However you possibly can simply see them shiver or you possibly can see them smile otherwise you, proper.

00:21:10 [Speaker Changed] They’re genuine and natural. You don’t have to fret. The phrases don’t matter.

00:21:13 [Speaker Changed] That’s proper. And, and a few stuff is, once more, we do quantitative testing, qualitative testing. Generally you’d do dial testing, proper? Throughout you’d, you’d air an episode and also you’d see like, what are the locations the place they both giggle or flip up the dial or down the dial. So all types of various techniques and strategies, however it’s artwork and science. I believe that’s, you understand, the good creators have an intuition and it may possibly’t simply be about, you understand, what occurred in that focus group.

00:21:40 [Speaker Changed] So now let’s pivot to interested by digital investing platforms and betterment. How transferable are these abilities when you find yourself wanting into what does a web based investor really need?

00:21:56 [Speaker Changed] So I believe there are transferable abilities after which there are, there’s a ton I needed to study, proper? Ah, so by way of transferable abilities, you understand, we had been speaking earlier about branding and advertising, proper? I believe that media is especially glorious at that, proper? And we had not only a home of manufacturers by way of Nickelodeon and MTV and Comedy Central, however then every of our mental properties, every of our reveals was successfully a model, proper? You needed to launch it and also you wanted to have a model plan. So SpongeBob had, and I’m positive has right this moment a ten or 15 12 months model plan always, 00:22:28 [Speaker Changed] 15 years for SpongeBob. You’re out forward, out forward. Like, let’s plan on these children who might be born in a decade. That’s proper

00:22:35 [Speaker Changed] That’s proper. That’s, you’re interested by motion pictures, you’re interested by tv collection. You’re interested by how you can, you understand, how you can, how you can hold the thrill alive, themes. So anyway, so all of that self-discipline is I believe, an extremely good studying floor that then can apply to any model constructing. I believe equally, as we had been speaking about all of the platforms, proper? The concept of how do you expose your model? The place do you expose your model? So all of that I believe, I believe works extremely nicely no matter trade operational excellence is one thing that in any enterprise, proper? You want to work out, which comes right down to setting, you understand, setting the principles and the parameters and what do you measure, proper? And the way, how essential is effectivity relative to progress, proper? These are all ideas that journey throughout companies. After which I believe individuals administration and organizational design is, is a extremely essential a part of, of, of any enterprise, proper? Is how do you construct a staff that works nicely collectively and the way do you place kind of the proper construction round that staff and the proper organizational design. And, and I had quite a lot of studying there as a result of, you understand, we reorganized each, I don’t know, 12 or 18 months over my 20 years at, at Biocom. Wow. So I believe that each one of that’s, is transferable.

00:23:50 [Speaker Changed] Huh. Actually, actually intriguing. So let’s discuss a bit of bit about 800,000
prospects. That’s quite a lot of prospects. Sure. It’s, what’s it like making an attempt to remain on high of all of that? That, that
looks as if that’s an immense variety of, of customers.
00:24:06 [Speaker Changed] Effectively, we, we’ve been at it a very long time. So, you
00:24:09 [Speaker Changed] Know, when, when did Betterment launch?
00:24:11 [Speaker Changed] Betterment launched in 2010. So
00:24:14 [Speaker Changed] 13
00:24:14 [Speaker Changed] Years robust. So it appears,
00:24:16 [Speaker Changed] Appears, I imply, my agency is 10 years outdated and it glided by like that 13 years
appears not, you understand, not, you guys are comparatively new, not as new as we’re, however nonetheless comparatively younger,
proper?
00:24:29 [Speaker Changed] Positive. I imply, within the, if you consider the arc of the wealth administration
enterprise, positive. We’re comparatively younger, however I believe when you think about the digital wealth administration
house, we had been, we had been early and, and one of many OGs, if you’ll, positive. However we, these 800,000
prospects truly are throughout three traces of enterprise. So we’re greatest recognized for our, what was as soon as
known as a RoboAdvisor. I like to think about it as a digital wealth administration platform. Now,
00:24:56 [Speaker Changed] I hate the title RoboAdvisor. I agree with you. It’s not a robotic and it’s not
there to supply recommendation. It’s a platform that you just construct on high of. That’s, not less than that’s how I consider it.
However,
00:25:06 [Speaker Changed] Effectively, I believe that within the, I believe that’s precisely proper. I additionally suppose that within the
early days, it was an easier concept, proper? Which was fulfilling a easy promise of low price and automation
and bringing entry to buyers who beforehand didn’t have entry to nice recommendation, bringing kind of the,
the only and clearest recommendation to that group, and due to this fact increasing entry. Now what we’re
studying, and we’ll get, we’ll get into kind of the, what’s occurred during the last decade is that that’s
actually solely the start. And so for us, I believe we consider kind of the Robo-advisor as the primary act. And
we then took that platform and thought lengthy and arduous about what do the purchasers actually need? And a few
of them need human recommendation, for instance, proper? That expertise shouldn’t be an, shouldn’t be adequate unto itself,
proper? So we prolonged that platform to the advisor neighborhood to RIAs, proper?
00:26:01 So the concept there was we’ve nice instruments, nice expertise that may scale and that may assist
advisors scale their practices. We don’t must compete with advisors. We are able to truly allow their
success. In order that was the subsequent enterprise line. After which we added a 3rd enterprise line, which is a 401k
enterprise for, for small and medium sized companies. And so that’s attention-grabbing as a result of in all three
enterprise traces, they’re very totally different. The client segments are very totally different for positive. However what they
share is that the large guys and the established incumbents all serve enterprise extremely nicely and serve,
serve rich individuals extremely nicely. And in all three situations, we’re increasing entry by means of the
use of expertise.
00:26:41 [Speaker Changed] So, so that you talked about low price and automation, and I wished to circle again
to that as a result of the automation is what permits low price, actually. So for, once more, good, what we do with
liftoff is we’ve Betterment energy our digital platform, however we connect a stay human advisor to that. And
that wouldn’t be financially viable for those who’re doing every part the way in which a standard RIA does it, ’trigger
that’s expensive. There’s lots of people, there’s quite a lot of work, there’s quite a lot of prices. You guys on the backend
plugged into this, make it very, very price environment friendly in order that the minimums go away, neglect 5 million or 1
million, there’s no minimal. You wanna open an account with $10,000, you possibly can and an individual can discuss
to you about it. However the technique of opening the account, funding it, onboarding it, all of the labor intensive
human actions, {that a} $10 million consumer desires somebody holding their arms, you guys have come up
with a extremely, actually nice set of applied sciences to automate that. Thank
00:27:48 [Speaker Changed] You. That’s precisely proper. I couldn’t have mentioned it higher myself.
00:27:52 [Speaker Changed] So, so what made you, early on, a few of your opponents thought the RA
trade was very a lot their opponents. How did you guys take a look at, and I do know a few of this predates
your, your tenure, however what made Betterman say, Hey, this can be a, part of the trade that we shouldn’t
ignore?
00:28:14 [Speaker Changed] It does predate me. I believe that’s proper. So I, I’ve been within the CEO seat for
three years. So John Stein, our founder, he actually noticed round corners, proper? And I believe, you understand, what
was so nice about him, and, and I believe tends to be true of founders basically, is that they’re all the time
innovating. They’re all the time interested by the subsequent concept. And I believe there have been kind of two motivations
for him. You understand, one was, nicely wait a minute, why, why don’t the RIAs, why don’t the human advisors
like us? Why do they see us as a menace? And as he began to dig in, he mentioned, nicely, wait a minute. We
don’t should be a menace. And that is one other, that is one other technique to meet prospects the place they’re,
proper? As a result of some prospects, you understand, younger digital savvy, you understand, not an enormous quantity of property
but could also be okay with a very digital answer.
00:29:03 However what he began to grasp and thru, you understand, speaking to prospects was that as
prospects turned extra refined and had life occasions, proper, acquired married, purchased a house, their
wants turned extra complicated and so they wished to speak to somebody. And so understanding that he
understood that there have been limitations kind of to the, to the attain that you possibly can have for those who had been solely
serving prospects instantly. And so somewhat than say, you understand, we’re anti-human in interplay, we mentioned,
he mentioned, let’s embrace that and let’s perceive that expertise plus people is healthier. So how can we
be techno nice expertise and nice service? And the way in which to do this was by means of the RIA neighborhood.
However, however you’re proper that within the early days, it wasn’t a lot that we noticed the RIAs as our opponents,
it’s that they noticed us as a competitor. Proper? And so one
00:29:51 [Speaker Changed] Of your opponents, who I gained’t point out by title, was very adversarial
with the RIA neighborhood. They’ve, you understand, a fraction of your property, however additionally they aren’t actually
working with advisors. Recognizing the totally different market segments appear to have been a giant win for you
guys.
00:30:08 [Speaker Changed] Yeah, I imply, I, I believe that it’s a mistake to not embrace the entire market,
proper? And to not acknowledge that, look, there are prospects who really feel comfy. I’ve had a monetary
advisor myself personally, for 20 years, proper? And, and that gives, you understand, peace of thoughts and it
supplies, and it’s a relationship, proper? This can be a relationship. Know-how is rarely going to switch a
relationship. Know-how can improve the service that that relationship supplier can provide you, however it’s
by no means gonna change it. And I believe recognizing that is without doubt one of the issues that differentiates us as a model
Yeah.
00:30:46 [Speaker Changed] To say to Completely. So that you talked about John Stein, you are available to CEO of
Betterment following a founder, that’s all the time a troublesome spot. Inform us a bit of bit what that was like.
00:30:58 [Speaker Changed] Effectively, it’s humorous. So I got here from such a distinct world, proper? I got here from
the company world and I didn’t know from founders and, and so I had no expectation. And in my
expertise, adjustments of management had been considerably commonplace, proper? Oh, you understand, if you’re at a
massive firm, issues change on a regular basis. And so I met John by means of a, truly a enterprise faculty
classmate of mine knew a board member at Betterment, which was sort of my path to Betterment. And
so I first met this board member and he or she launched me to John. And I believe he was at a second in his
profession the place he was pondering, look, I constructed this factor and I’m kind of, I’m getting antsy. I’m, I’m sort of
prepared for the subsequent, and I need this to be a giant enterprise to scale, whether or not it goes public or regardless of the
subsequent act of this enterprise is.
00:31:46 It’s an act that I’ve not had expertise in. And he was self-aware sufficient to grasp that
now perhaps was the time, if, if Betterment was gonna sort of take the subsequent step, perhaps there was a
totally different sort of management that might assist try this. So he was assembly candidates and we met and we
acquired alongside extremely nicely. He’s nonetheless on the board, so he’s a sounding board for issues, however we introduced
actually totally different abilities to the get together, proper? He was not a marketer and a model builder, proper? And I believe in
the early days, there was a thought right here that kind of, for those who construct it, they are going to come. And this concept that
like, you understand, a product led develop, product led progress was the kind of holy grail, proper? And I believe that
within the early days, that was a great concept. I believe the truth is what the, what John and others who type
of innovated round his time did, is that they pushed the entire trade to embrace expertise, perhaps be
quicker than they’d have, proper? Out of worry, proper? Not not like my expertise within the media enterprise,
proper? Which was, you possibly can’t ignore, you possibly can’t put blinders on and ignore streaming. You gotta soar in.
00:32:49 [Speaker Changed] It’s so humorous you say that as a result of it’s streaming and media, it’s Tesla and
the remainder of the auto trade and EVs, it’s Amazon forcing all people to have some on-line retail. A a
technological disruptor is available in. And it’s not simply that one firm. The complete trade has to take
discover and say, both we adapt or we get left behind. That’s proper. That’s proper. And, and that’s actually,
actually substantial. So from the place you sit, coming from a media background, is it secure to say management is
management? It doesn’t matter what the product is that you just’re promoting, you’re main individuals.
00:33:28 [Speaker Changed] I, I believe so. I imply, I believe that there’s actually, you want some consultants in
the combination, proper? I’m not gonna say that, you understand, no trade expertise wanted right here, however you are able to do
that throughout the context of a balanced staff. And so I believe, you understand, I occur to, I occur to have a
incredible staff, and the staff is actually made up of a bunch of parents who had been right here earlier than I used to be and are
actually deep consultants within the house. After which we complimented them with a handful, 4 or 5 new people
who I introduced from the skin who had a contemporary perspective and perhaps had a distinct skillset.
00:34:01 [Speaker Changed] Huh. Actually intriguing. So let’s discuss a bit of bit concerning the historical past of the digital
funding platforms. These kind of launched after the monetary disaster, sort of 2010s or so. There
had been some nice expectations when among the preliminary corporations launched. A lot of your opponents
haven’t lived as much as these lofty expectations. How do you take a look at the sphere and say, why have a few of
these corporations simply not gotten it finished?
00:34:35 [Speaker Changed] So I believe basically, there was a kind of a worry, worry slash expectation,
proper? That digital was gonna, you understand, take over the enterprise, proper? And in order that clearly had massive
greenback indicators in individuals’s eyes.
00:34:48 [Speaker Changed] There was a gold rush for some time, proper? Individuals spent some huge cash shopping for
digital platforms. A lot of these purchases didn’t work out, however it was fairly, it appeared like, hey, these
guys are come and eat our lunch,
00:35:01 [Speaker Changed] Proper? And I believe, look, that’s not not like the kind of digital growth and bust
in each trade, proper? Which is consider Amazon, proper? Amazon gained, however there was, there, there
was quite a lot of roadkill by the aspect of the highway, proper? Whether or not it was eToys or you understand, to proper to
keep in mind only a model title, proper? There have been an entire variety of these corporations.
00:35:20 [Speaker Changed] Pets.com is the one that stands out to me, proper?
00:35:23 [Speaker Changed] Like all of them emerged, all of them, I imply, Amazon was books, proper? It wasn’t
the every part retailer, it was books. And I believe, you understand, they, they gained as a result of they had been glorious,
proper? They usually delivered. They, they’d, they had been maniacal concerning the shopper, proper? They usually, and
they only continued to construct off of tremendous serving that shopper. And I believe
00:35:43 [Speaker Changed] No matter revenue, they’re keen to postpone pleasure with a view to do the heavy
stuff tremendous
00:35:47 [Speaker Changed] Serve upfront, proper? As a result of they knew that referrals and prospects who
liked them was the holy grail, proper? Yeah. And so, you understand, they gained. So I believe the identical might be mentioned
in, in any trade, proper? I imply, Netflix has, is is the clear chief within the streaming house. And I believe,
you understand, I intend for Betterment to be the clear chief within the digital wealth administration house.
00:36:08 [Speaker Changed] So what does Betterment should do to differentiate itself from the remainder of
the pack? And the remainder of the pack consists of Vanguard in addition to a bunch of different a lot smaller clear
sheet startups in, within the house.
00:36:24 [Speaker Changed] So my aspiration is kind of what, what Amazon did for Walmart, proper?
Which is it pushed them to be higher and, however finally there’s room for each. I believe that could be very true
within the wealth administration house as nicely. So I believe, you understand, Schwab and Constancy and Vanguard, like
these are the good manufacturers. These are my mother and father’ manufacturers, proper?
00:36:44 [Speaker Changed] And and so they all have their very own in-house digital platform.
00:36:47 [Speaker Changed] That’s proper. As a result of they knew that that must be a part of the combination. And I
suppose equally, proper? If I take into consideration these as manufacturers, I believe the expertise is a begin. However I believe constructing
a model that understands the client section you serve is gonna be critically essential by way of
who wins and who loses. And so what I aspire to for Betterment is that we should always change into the millennial
and Gen Z wealth administration model the way in which Schwab or Constancy serves our mother and father.
00:37:17 [Speaker Changed] Huh? That, that, that’s intriguing. So if you’re doing the kind of
buyer evaluation that you just did again at Viacom, at Betterment, what are you discovering from each your
present purchasers and, and people who find themselves potential purchasers, what’s it that the patron is on the lookout for in
recommendation from a digital platform?
00:37:39 [Speaker Changed] So I believe before everything, they’re on the lookout for nice expertise and nice
service.
00:37:44 [Speaker Changed] So, so if you say nice expertise, I consider ease of use, person interface,
these types of issues
00:37:51 [Speaker Changed] That That’s precisely proper. That’s precisely proper. And, and so they’ve grown up
proper with a cellphone of their hand, so to talk, proper? And so I believe what, what labored for patrons a
era in the past, I believe the expectations are simply raised proper? And so by way of what expertise can
ship, it must be on cellular, not simply ease of use, however ease of use on cellular. I wanna have the ability to do
every part on my cellphone, don’t make me sit down on the laptop, for instance, proper? And that’s
truly not the way in which we had been born, proper? A decade in the past. These digital platforms had been on-line as opposed
to digital. And we’ve moved the phrase on-line to digital as a result of actually we must be cellular first, proper?
Proper. And I believe, I wouldn’t say that Betterment was kind of first in its class on recognizing the ability of
cellular on this house.
00:38:35 As a result of once we had been, once we originated the model and the enterprise, we thought this can be a
thought of buy. And as a thought of buy, individuals are gonna sit down at their desktop and
they’re gonna do their analysis. And that also is true for lots of parents after they join. However when you
have this, your, your wealth someplace, you wanna have the ability to test it and also you wanna have the ability to test
it wherever you might be, you understand, within the toilet, on-line, wherever you might be. And that’s in your cellphone.
And in order that’s been an enormous push, you understand, throughout my tenure the final couple years is, is saying we want
to suppose cellular first. In order that’s simply an instance of kind of usability and the place it’s worthwhile to be, and
maybe apparent, however essential.
00:39:11 [Speaker Changed] All proper, so that you began with a web based platform. You go to cellular. If we’re
wanting on the subsequent nice expertise, it’s virtually a cliche to say AI is gonna change all these items. How
does a digital on-line funding platform use AI to make itself and its merchandise extra fascinating to its
purchasers?
00:39:33 [Speaker Changed] So ai, consider it as supercharging every part we do, proper? So it’s inflicting us
actually to re-litigate each course of we’ve and say, can we do it higher, stronger, quicker? And the way can
expertise allow that? So we’re beginning actually within the again workplace, and that’s each inner and buyer
dealing with. So take into consideration, you understand, writing first drafts of promoting items, proper? Get, you understand, placing
some inputs, giving an task to the AI and letting them draft one thing you could then use as a
leaping off level. Take into consideration buyer. That’s simply an instance. Take into consideration customer support, not
essentially, I believe a chat bot can reply easy questions, but additionally you possibly can have AI develop extra
refined solutions that then the human service operator can translate for the patron, proper? So
rushing up each a type of interactions. Take into consideration a model new engineer becoming a member of the staff who
doesn’t know you understand something about betterment and wishes to seek out, you understand, discover his or her approach.
00:40:32 You understand, we’ve a chance to get them up to the mark quicker, proper? As a result of there’s simply
extra data simply accessible at their, at their fingertips. So what I don’t see AI doing, or not less than
not but, is changing the, the fiduciary function that we play, proper? Which is we’ve a accountability to our
prospects that’s extremely regulated and that requires that we act of their greatest curiosity. And there nonetheless is a
lot within the expertise the place there’s what they name hallucination, proper? Are they giving good recommendation? So,
so we predict that the, the expertise is an allow enabler, however not a lot a substitute for.
00:41:10 [Speaker Changed] So, so I like the time period hallucination. You by no means labored at Roku and also you
by no means labored at UBS, however once I’m finished with my analysis, I’ll then run it by means of chat GBT 4 and
perplexity, that are, one is clawed and one is the, I forgot the opposite driver, simply to see what comes up
and, oh, I missed, how did I miss Roku? How did I miss UBS? Seems I didn’t, they had been mistaken and
hallucinating, which is why it’s a must to have a human bubble double test it, however it, it, it nonetheless has this
attain and depth that it’s so fast and really easy. It, it actually creates, you understand, a primary draft is mostly a good
approach to consider it, so long as you’re reality checking it and conscious that it, it’s usually mistaken.
00:41:56 [Speaker Changed] That’s proper. And it’s a must to have guardrails, proper? And so I believe we’re
being very considerate in, in how we deploy ai, however I believe we might be silly to not be embracing the
expertise as a result of, you understand, if we will pace every part up, we do by 10% or 15% utilizing the
expertise, then, you understand, higher, stronger, quicker,
00:42:13 [Speaker Changed] Proper? And, and we normally measure productiveness features in, in, you understand,
single decimal factors. 10% or 15% is simply immense. That’s, that’s a sport altering enchancment. Yeah.
00:42:25 [Speaker Changed] I imply you speak about do extra with much less, proper? I imply, that is the best
instance. Yeah,
00:42:29 [Speaker Changed] Completely. So earlier than we get to our favourite questions, I’ve a curve ball
query to throw at you. You might be presently a board member for the Lucius and Lit Tower Basis, as
nicely as Funko and catalyte. Inform us a bit of bit about these organizations. Positive.
00:42:46 [Speaker Changed] So I’ll begin with Lucius Littauer is a basis and we help entry to
alternative and we help a collection of Jewish causes. There was a, a person named Lucius Littauer, and he
handed away with none heirs. And so we’ve a bunch of people who find themselves entrusted to hold on his
legacy. In order that’s, that’s been a, a, an ideal one for greater than 10 years I’ve been doing that. Funko Inc is a
popular culture firm. It’s a public firm. You could have heard of Funko Pop, that are like little type
of plastic characters. That’s the signature merchandise we promote. However actually when you consider fandom, it’s a fan
firm. And that’s been, once more, quite a lot of enjoyable. That’s been my first public firm board. After which
Catalyte is a newer board that I joined, and that may be a firm that sits truly on the intersection
of AI and variety and inclusion. And it’s about creating pathways for underrepresented teams who
don’t have 4 12 months school levels into larger incomes jobs utilizing AI to grasp aptitude and
probability of success. Huh. And it’s cool firm.
00:43:53 [Speaker Changed] Sounds actually attention-grabbing. All proper, so we solely have you ever for a couple of extra
minutes. Let’s soar to our favourite questions that we ask all of our company beginning with you’re the
excellent individual to ask this query. What are you streaming nowadays? Inform us about what you’re
watching on Netflix or Amazon or Hulu or Disney or Paramount Plus or something you may be streaming. So

00:44:16 [Speaker Changed] I binge consistently the brand new season of Gradual Horses

00:44:21 [Speaker Changed] Season three, proper? Season

00:44:23 [Speaker Changed] Three. That, that’s one which, that I’ve just lately streamed. I

00:44:28 [Speaker Changed] It’s a extremely attention-grabbing present.

00:44:30 [Speaker Changed] It’s a, it’s an ideal present that’s on Apple. I find it irresistible. That’s on Apple. Yep. I lovedalso on Apple. I liked Classes in Chemistry, which I learn the ebook first.

00:44:39 [Speaker Changed] Oh actually? That, that’s likeQ and I haven’t gotten to it but.

00:44:41 [Speaker Changed] That’s a great one. I actually favored it, however I additionally learn the ebook. So, so these,
these are two of my, I I like. Oh, I simply watched The Pacific, which is an outdated, which is a by-product of Band of
Brothers, HBO should have just lately offered a bunch of stuff to Netflix. So it surfaced in my algorithm and it
was a by-product of Band of Brothers. And it was about, it’s about World Conflict ii.

00:45:02 [Speaker Changed] Didn’t Band of Brothers find yourself there additionally?

00:45:04 [Speaker Changed] It did. It did. However I had seen that and I had by no means heard of the Pacific, however it,
it surfaced then I watched that it was concerning the Pacific Theater throughout World Conflict ii. Actually attention-grabbing.

00:45:13 [Speaker Changed] Because you’re mentioning wartime reveals, have you ever seen all the sunshine you
can not see?

00:45:19 [Speaker Changed] Oh, so not solely have I seen it, however it’s one in all my favourite books. Improbable.
Actually?

00:45:23 [Speaker Changed] They usually did an ideal job

00:45:24 [Speaker Changed] On They did, they did Hugh

00:45:26 [Speaker Changed] Laurie’s nice. It’s simply, what’s it, six episodes? One thing like

00:45:28 [Speaker Changed] That. Yeah. I wished it to maintain going.

00:45:29 [Speaker Changed] It was actual. Yeah, it was actual. It was a type of belongings you’re, if you’re
unhappy when a present ends. Yeah. It’s like, that’s how, you understand, it’s a extremely good a a extremely good present. Inform
us about your early mentors who helped form your profession.

00:45:41 [Speaker Changed] My early mentors had been, had been actually my bosses. So I labored early on for a, a
man at Disney named Peter Murphy, who was a, an ideal mentor to me. After which a girl named Dan
Sarnoff, who turned, finally was working the Warner Brothers studio. She, she was my first job
outta enterprise faculty. After which a fellow who was the COO at Nickelodeon earlier than I used to be named Jeff
Dunn, who went on to run Sesame Workshop. These had been in all probability my three.
00:46:10 [Speaker Changed] Let’s speak about books. What are a few of your favorites? What are you
studying proper now?
00:46:15 [Speaker Changed] So I like historic fiction and I like a great seashore learn. So proper now I’m
studying the Elon Musk biography and I’m additionally studying Demon Copper Demon Copperhead, which is a
Barbara Olver, which is incredible

00:46:33 [Speaker Changed] Demon copperhead. What’s, what kind of ebook is that?

00:46:35 [Speaker Changed] It’s about a bit of boy who grows up in foster care and I believe it’s gonna be
concerning the opioids disaster, however I haven’t gotten to that. I haven’t gotten to that half but.

00:46:45 [Speaker Changed] Huh. You understand, we talked about Innovator’s Dilemma earlier. Did you ever
learn Loon pictures?

00:46:50 [Speaker Changed] I didn’t.

00:46:51 [Speaker Changed] So it, it’s by, by a professor, I’m drawing clean on his title in the mean time.
But it surely’s how each firm is actually two corporations. One is that small startup and the opposite is the
firm that has its personal ongoing income supply. And the way do you stability the necessity to not eat your
seed corn, however on the identical time take occasional moonshots. And it, it’s a problem for lots of
corporations. Apple is an instance of an organization that’s keen to cannibalize their very own merchandise so as
to remain forward of the competitors. Actually, actually simply fascinating. And I considered it ’explanation for, of what you
had mentioned earlier, massive corporations have a tendency to not do these moonshots. The title, title of the ebook is
Moonshots. I’m positive I’ll, it’ll pop into my head later. Our, our final two questions. What kind of recommendation
would you give to a current school grad taken with a profession in both media or investing?

00:47:54 [Speaker Changed] So I all the time suppose the coaching per the funding banking coaching applications
are a great way to start out. They’re kind of like bootcamp for a pair years the place they, you understand, train
you to grasp p and ls and monetary modeling. And I believe that’s a extremely transferrable talent. So I, I
suppose these are incredible applications. I additionally suppose nowadays, you understand, whether or not I’m a monetary firm
or a expertise firm is kind of a query we ask ourselves each day. Positive. And I believe the reply is
each, however engineering and laptop science is an extremely fabulous profession nowadays, and I believe
opens quite a lot of doorways. However that appeals to a, you understand, a sure, a sure section of the inhabitants.

00:48:30 [Speaker Changed] And our ultimate query, what have you learnt concerning the world of branding,
advertising or expertise and investing right this moment? You want you knew 25 or so years in the past if you had been
actually getting began?

00:48:45 [Speaker Changed] Effectively, the world of investing, I might say I didn’t absolutely admire the ability
of beginning early and the ability of, you understand, compounding. You understand, save what you possibly can. I believe I additionally
underappreciated actually till I acquired to Betterment. I underappreciated how a lot prices and taxes can
undermine investing returns. And so to be, to be cognizant of these issues. After which lastly, I might say
take benefit early on of the, of what the federal government presents by way of tax advantaged accounts.
’trigger that may be an actual step up. So whether or not that’s for taking part in an organization 401k or IRAs, proper.
These are all nice alternatives for saving.

00:49:26 [Speaker Changed] Effectively, nicely thanks Sarah for being so beneficiant along with your time. We’ve got
been talking with Sarah Kirschbaum Levy. She is the CEO of Betterment. If you happen to get pleasure from this dialog,
nicely try any of the earlier 500 we’ve had over the previous 9 years. Yow will discover these at iTunes,
Spotify, Bloomberg, YouTube, wherever you discover your favourite podcasts. Join my each day studying
listing@ritholtz.com. Observe me on Twitter whereas it’s nonetheless round at ritholtz. Observe the entire Bloomberg
Household of podcasts at podcast. I might be remiss if I didn’t thank the crack employees that places these
conversations collectively every week. My audio engineer is Kaylee Lap. Anna. Luke is my producer. Sean
Russo is my researcher. Tika Val is my venture supervisor. I’m Barry Ritholtz. You’ve been listening to
Masters in Enterprise on Bloomberg Radio.

 

~~~

 

Print Friendly, PDF & EmailPrint Friendly, PDF & Email
RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments